H. pylori is a Gram-negative bacteria that colonizes the mucus layer of the gastric epithelium, by the means of interaction between surface proteins and gastric epithelial receptors. The most common way of transmission is oral-to-oral and fecal-to-oral contact. Its infection utilizes chemotaxis and release of cytokines, and induces both, humoral and cellular immune responses. H. pylori diagnosis methods are variable, being mainly highlighted by endoscopy, histology and several tests. The treatment of such infection is difficult, and requires a triple antibiotic therapy. Nowadays, probiotics are being significantly used in such treatment.
Introduction
Helicobacter pylori has been the subject of intense investigation since its culture from a gastric biopsy in 1982. From the beginning, this gram-negative bacterium has provoked the interest of bacteriologists, gastroenterologists, infectious disease specialists, cancer biologists, epidemiologists, pathologists, and pharmaceutical scientists. The possibility that a bacterium could cause gastritis, peptic ulcers, and, over time, cancer was a concept that was difficult to put forward.
Owing to the unique characteristics of H. pylori, such as its microaerophily, nitrogen metabolism, and ecological niche, a sound understanding of its physiology and genetics is of interest to fundamental and applied microbiology, taxonomy, molecular biology, microbial ecology, and medical, veterinary, and agricultural microbiology.
I. An overview of Helicobacter pylori
Helicobacter pylori was previously named Campylobacter pyloridis. It migrated out of Africa along with the ancestors. It is a microaerophilic Gram-negative bacterium, having a curved spiral shape, characterized by a high motility since it has 2-6 flagella. It colonizes mainly the mucus layer of the gastric epithelium of the lumen in the upper half of the gastric pit, but not too closely related mucus-secreting neck cells in the lower half of the gastric pit. It does not adhere to chief cells, parietal cells, or endocrine cells in the gastric pit. The most common way of transmission is oral-to-oral and fecal-to-oral contact, eliciting both humoral and cellular immune responses. The treatment of H. pylori is difficult, since it requires a combined intake of a proton pump inhibitor with amoxicillin and one of the two antibiotics, clarithromycin or metronidazole (Johnson et al., 2017).
I-1. Colonization
Colonization takes place upon several strains, and these strains evolve rapidly. So, the infected individual not only carries his own H. pylori strain, but this strain can undergo genetic alteration, driven by an elevated mutation rate, leading to free recombination of H. pylori genes. Therefore, plasticity of H. pylori is revealed, affecting surface proteins, such as the outer membrane proteins (OMPs), housekeeping genes, virulence genes and lipopolysaccharides (LPS), thus contributing to host adaptation, persistence and immune response evasion (Johnson et al., 2017).
I-1.1. Surface proteins
I-1.1.1. Lipopolysaccharides
(LPS)
H.
pylori is characterized by having several lipopolysaccharides (LPS). LPS
is the major component of the bacterial cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria. In
H. pylori, it is consisted of an O-specific polysaccharide chain, a core
oligosaccharide, and a lipid part called lipid A, embedded in the outer
membrane. The O-antigen of H. pylori contains different human Lewis-like
antigens, including Lewis (Le)x, Ley, Lea and
Leb. These antigens play a role in the adherence to gastric
epithelial cells in a Lewis-antigen-dependent manner, more specifically via Lex.
The receptor recognized by the O-antigen side-chain of LPS is a host
β-galactoside-binding lectin, galectin-3. The expression of galectin-3 is up
regulated by gastric epithelial cells following adherence of H. pylori.
So, in addition to colonization, this lectin plays a role in the host response
to infection (Johnson et al., 2017).
I-1.1.2.
Outer membrane proteins (OMPs)
H. pylori is also
characterized by having several outer membrane proteins (OMPs). OMPs
are divided into five gene families. The largest family is Family 1, comprised
of Hop and Hor proteins. Families 2 and 3 comprise Hof and Hom proteins
respectively. Families 4 and 5 are composed of iron-regulated OMPs and efflux
pump OMPs respectively (Johnson et al., 2017).
·
BabA: the first blood group antigen-binding adhesin A to be identified, also
named HopS. It mediates the binding of H. pylori to the fucosylated
Lewis b blood group antigen, Leb. Thus, the T4SS secretion system is
activated, triggering the transcription of genes that enhance inflammation,
development of intestinal metaplasia, and associated precancerous
transformations.
·
SabA: the second well known adhesion, sialic acid-binding adhesin, also named
HopP or OMP17. Upon infection and mucosal inflammation, the
sialyl-dimeric-Lewis x (Lex) glycosphingolipid is up regulated, and
SabA mediated the binding of H. pylori to the sialyl-dimeric-Lex,
thus strengthening the epithelial attachment needed to achieve successful
colonization. SabA binds to neutrophils, so as a consequence, these neutrophils
produce reactive oxygen species causing oxidative damage of gastric epithelium.
·
AlpA, AlpB: adherence associated lipoproteins AlpA, also named HopC or OMP20, and
AlpB, also named HopB or OMP21. They induce gastric injury by modulating pro-inflammatory
intracellular signaling cascades upon infection, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8),
which is an important T cell and neutrophil chemoattractant.
·
OipA: outer inflammatory protein A, also named HopH or OMP13. It also promotes
IL-8 secretion, inducing inflammation. Even more, it is associated with more
severe gastric diseases such as duodenal ulcer, gastric cancer and neutrophil
infiltration. It is involved in H. pylori-induced focal adhesion kinase
activation and cytoskeletal reorganization of gastric epithelial cells.
·
HopZ: also named OMP1. It is associated with the development of MALT lymphoma.
·
HomB: the smallest family of OMP. As the previous proteins, it is associated
with IL-8 secretion, and contributes to bacterial adherence and more severe
clinical outcomes (Oleastro et al.,
2013).
I-1.2. Gastric epithelial receptors
H. pylori has major gastric
epithelial receptors which are the Lewis blood group antigens and sialylated
glycans (Oleastro et al.,
2013).
I-1.2.1. Lewis blood group
antigens
The major component of gastric mucus layer
are the highly glycosylated mucin proteins. In healthy mucosa, mucins produced
are MUC1, MUC5AC and MUC6. MUC5AC plays a role in the adherence of H. pylori
to the gastric mucosa, while MUC6 exhibits an antimicrobial activity. The major
receptor of H. pylori is the Leb carbohydrate structure
present in the normal gastric tissue. MUC5AC is the most important carrier of
Leb, being attached through BabA (Oleastro et al., 2013).
I-1.2.2. Sialylated glycans
Under the clinical conditions caused by a severe H. pylori infection,
Leb is weakly expressed while there is an upward migration of Lex.
Moreover, there is an expression of sialylated glycans, such as sialyl-Lea
and sialyl-Lex, where H. pylori binds to sialyl-Lex via
SabA adhesins.
During an established infection, H. pylori colonization favors
the acquisition of nutrients released from the damaged host cells, and the
delivery of effector molecules into the gastric cell, such as CagA oncoprotein
and VacA cytotoxin (Oleastro et al.,
2013).
I-2. Chemotaxis
H.
pylori utilizes chemotaxis, driven by a conserved signal transduction
system. Chemotaxis allows H. pylori to sense an array of environmental
and bacterial signals within the stomach, guiding its motility towards its
preferred niche within the gastric mucosa and glands, away from harmful
conditions (Arachchi et al.,
2017).
The chemotaxis system of H. pylori contains core chemotaxis
proteins found in all chemotaxis systems, and auxiliary ones found in only
some. The core chemotaxis proteins are the chemoreceptors (TlpA, TlpB, TlpC and
TlpD), the CheW coupling protein, the CheA kinase, and the CheY response
regulator. The auxiliary chemotaxis proteins include three CheV-type coupling
proteins (CheV1, CheV2 and CheV3), the CheZ phosphatase, and the unique
chemotaxis protein ChePep, which localizes CheZ to the poles. Environmental
signals are sensed either directly or indirectly by chemoreceptors, and are
relayed to the histidine kinase CheA via the CheW or CheV1 coupling proteins (Arachchi et al., 2017).
Chemicals sensed as repellents activate CheA's auto-phosphorylation, and
this phosphoryl group is passed then to CheY via histidine-to-aspartate.
Phosphorylated CheY interacts with the flagellar motor, causing it to rotate
clockwise, so the bacteria change its direction (Arachchi et al., 2017).
Mutants in any one of these proteins are non-chemotactic (Che-).
Mutants of CheW, CheA, CheY, CheV1 and CheV2 display straight swimming
phenotypes, since they do not produce phosphorylated CheY. While mutants of
CheZ and CheV3 display hyper-reversal phenotypes, since they produce high
amounts of phosphorylated CheY (Arachchi
et al., 2017).
H.
pylori senses specific chemicals via three transmembrane chemoreceptors
(TlpA, TlpB and TlpC), and one cytoplasmic receptor (TlpD) (Arachchi et al., 2017).
It
faces several repellent conditions. Many of these are host generated,
including acidic pH, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and bile. The acidity of the
lumen of the stomach is toxic to H. pylori. It acts as a chemo-repellent
with TlpA, TlpB, TlpD and TlpC. Another signal is the ROS, produced by host
epithelial and immune cells (Arachchi
et al., 2017).
It is also repelled by the
self-generated, quorum-sensing molecule autoinducer-2 (AI-2), promoting
dispersion of H. pylori. It also responds to its own electron transport
chain (ETC) (Arachchi et al.,
2017).
H.
pylori senses several beneficial chemo-attractants, such as urea and
Arginine, an important amino acid for H. pylori. In non-infected
individuals, urea is available within the stomach, and is hydrolyzed by H.
pylori urease into ammonia and bicarbonate. Both chemo-attractants help H.
pylori to find key nutrients, and direct it towards the epithelial
surface (Arachchi et al.,
2017).
Chemotaxis is required for wild-type (WT) level colonization of the
stomach. Che- do not colonize at all, or poorly colonize, since they
require 100-fold more bacteria to initiate colonization (Arachchi et al., 2017).
Chemotaxis during early infection: Chemotaxis
is critical during the first three months of an infection. During this period,
Che- mutants display significant colonization defects (Arachchi et al., 2017).
Chemotaxis during chronic infecton: Che-
H. pylori are able to achieve WT levels of colonization as early as one
month post infection. During the chronic stage of infection, Che- colonizes
gastric glands in the corpus and antrum. While WT colonizes the mucus layer of
the corpus too (Arachchi et al.,
2017).
I-3. Cytokine profile
Inflammation occurs upon recognition of microbial-associated molecular
patterns (MAMPs), or damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by local
monocytes, macrophages and epithelial cells. These cells release
pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that recruit neutrophils and antigen
presenting cells, including macrophages and dendritic cells, to the site of
infection. This primes T-cell differentiation and induces the differentiation
of T-helper (Arachchi et al.,
2017).
Th17
cells are important in immunity to extracellular bacterial and fungal
infections. The cytokine profile of Th17 cells includes IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21
and IL-22, where the maintenance of Th17 cells population is mediated by IL-23
and IL-21. Upon infection of the gastric mucosa by H. pylori, a local
high level of IL-17A, IL-23, IL-21 and TNF-α were detected. Specifically, IL-17
recruits neutrophils, and stimulate TNF-α secretion and other pro-inflammatory
cytokines like IL-1 and IL-6. It also stimulates the fibroblasts to produce
matrix metalloproteinases, which further contributes to mucosal damage and
carcinogenesis. Regarding TNF-α, it specifically acts on endothelial cells to
stimulate expression if adhesion molecules, facilitating the extravasation of neutrophils
into the site of infection on the mucosal tissue. It can further activate T
cells and stimulate cytokine production by macrophages and monocytes (Arachchi et al., 2017).
So, the elevation of these
cytokines among H. pylori infection suggests that in the Th17 pathway, IL-21
helps to maintain the Th17 cells and thus regulate Th17 effector responses
during chronic H. pylori infection. This supports the role of Th17 in the
pathogenesis of H. pylori infection, and the severity of gastritis (Arachchi
et al., 2017).
I-4. H. pylori and bottled drinking water
Bottled drinking water is contaminated with dangerous pathogens
such as H. pylori. Colonization and invasion of H. pylori to
gastric mucous is due to a number of virulence factors, such as vacuolating
cytotoxin (vacA), induced by contact with the epithelium antigen (iceA),
cytotoxin associated gene (cag), blood group antigen-binding adhesion (babA)
and outer inflammatory protein (oip). The vacA gene is
polymorphic, comprising variable signal regions (type s1 or s2)
and mid-regions (type m1 or m2). The s1 type is further
subtyped into s1a, s1b and s1c subtypes and the m1
into m1a and m1b subtypes. The iceA gene has two main
allelic variants iceA1 and iceA2. CagE is 1 of 6 genes
located within the pathogenicity island shown to induce secretion of
chemokines, such as IL-8 and induce inflammation (Ranjbar et al.,
2016).
Bottled mineral water samples are specifically contaminated with
resistant and virulent strains of H. pylori. They are
resistant to amoxicillin, metronidazole, clarithromycin, furazolidone,
quinolones and tetracycline. Drinking water can pose a substantial threat for
transmission of H. pylori because of several important
criteria. These criteria include the ability of H. pylori to
adhere to different materials and to co-aggregate with other bacteria and form
complex structures on pipes or other surfaces in contact with water. Notion
about the disability of H. pylori to survive alone in running
water, but to develop a symbiotic relationship and form complex structures on
contact surfaces, makes it rational to assume that groundwater is a reservoir
for H. pylori due to its stagnant nature (Ranjbar et al., 2016).
Other possible reasons for the high prevalence of H. pylori in
bottled mineral water samples are (i) lack of competent approaches for water
sanitization; (ii) expending the distrustful groundwater for producing the
bottled mineral water; (iii) the opportunity of presence of bacterial colonies
as a biofilm in the in pipes used for water transfer; (iv) the opportunity of
leakage of household, industrial and agricultural wastewater to the sources of
mineral water; and finally (v) lack of personal hygiene of refinery room’s
staffs (Ranjbar et al., 2016).
I-5. Diagnosis
of infection
I-5.1. Traditional diagnosis
H.
pylori traditional
diagnosis is made using a combination of tests. Considering the
broad spectrum of diagnostic methods, only highly accurate tests should be used
in clinical practice under specific circumstances and currently, the
sensitivity and specificity of such tests should exceed 90% (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-5.1.1. Endoscopy
Three
paired biopsies for histology were taken at the antrum, corpus lesser (CLC),
and greater curve (CGC). Additional specimens were obtained at the antrum and
CGC for a rapid urease test (RUT). Collecting venules, seen as numerous
minute red dots in the gastric corpus, were a characteristic finding in the normal
stomach without H. pylori infection. This finding was termed
“regular arrangement of collecting venules” (RAC) (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-5.1.2. Histology
Recognizing that the number and
distribution of H. pylori organisms vary in patients taking
proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), it has been recommended to discontinue PPIs two
weeks before endoscopy and to take biopsies from both the body and the antrum.
Antigen stool detection can also give false-negative results in these
circumstances. In contrast, serology is not influenced to such an extent by a
lower density of the microorganism, and is reliable even in advanced gastric
body atrophy. Pathologists have used different diagnostic techniques, including
immunohistochemical (IHC) methods and special stains, such as Giemsa and
Warthin-Starry. On the other hand, it is clear that IHC staining is highly
sensitive and specific for H. pylori, with the lowest rate of inter
observer variation and is much faster than conventional histology. H. pylori detection
has increasingly focused on specific clinical settings and patient groups
(bleeding peptic ulcer, gastric cancer) (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-5.2. Tests
I-5.2.1. Rapid Urease Test (RUT)
The RUT is based on the production
of large amounts of urease enzyme by H. pylori, which splits the
urea test reagent to form ammonia, enabling its detection by a rapid indirect
test. Many commercial RUTs are available, including gel-based tests,
paper-based tests and liquid-based tests, providing a result in 1-24 h,
depending on the format of the test and the bacterial density in the biopsy
specimen. An important conclusion of several studies is that enhancing the
number of biopsy fragments and/or collecting them from various regions of the
stomach (antrum and body, from example), achieves a higher sensibility of the
RUT. Moreover, it was shown recently that combining tissues prior to RUT
increased the detection of H. pylori, compared with testing
separate specimens, and produced faster results (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-5.2.2. Culture
The most commonly used media
include Brucella, Columbia Wilkins-Chalgren, brain-heart infusion or trypticase
agar bases, supplemented with sheep or horse blood. An alternative to blood is
supplementation of the agar base with β-cyclodextrin or yolk emulsion.
Supplementation of media with cholesterol instead of serum was a viable option
for H. pylori growth. Another original approach used liquid
culture medium for the rapid cultivation and subsequent antibiotics
susceptibility testing of H. pylori directly from biopsy
specimens, with a final detection step by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA). It also requires an atmosphere enriched with CO2 and O2.
Besides the issue concerning bleeding peptic ulcers, for which culture has a
lower sensitivity than in non-bleeding cases, other host-related factors, such
as high activity of gastritis, low bacterial load, drinking alcohol and the use
of histamine H2 receptor blockers, have been recently described
as the cause of failed H. pylori culture from gastric mucosa
in the infected subjects (Lopes et
al., 2014).
I-5.2.3. Urea Breath Test
The 13 C-urea breath test (13C-UBT)
is one of the most reliable tests for diagnosing H. pylori infection.
It is a non-invasive, simple and safe test that provides excellent accuracy
both for the initial diagnosis of H. pylori infection
and for the confirmation of its eradication after treatment. Excellent accuracy
is obtained when breath samples are collected as early as 10-15 min after urea
ingestion. The 13C-UBT in adults has a high sensitivity and
specificity. However, the test has shown heterogeneous accuracy in the pediatric population, especially in young children (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-5.2.4. Stool Antigen Test
The stool antigen test is a
non-invasive method to detect H. pylori, usually recommended when
the UBT is not available. There are two types of stool antigen tests used
for H. pylori detection, the EIA and an assay based on
immunochromatography. These tests are the Testmate pylori antigen EIA, in which
plastic 96-well EIA microtiter plates are coated with monoclonal antibody (Mab)
21G2, and the Testmate rapid pylori antigen, which is based in
immunochromatography and is presented as a test strip. For the EIA test, a drop
of the suspended stool sample or a sample of the diluted bacterial antigen
sample is mixed with the peroxidase-conjugated MAb 21G2. After proper
incubation and washing, the optical density is measured. For the test strip, a
drop of stool sample is applied in the specimen application of the test strip.
When H. pylori antigens are present, they form immune
complexes with the red latex-labeled MAb 21Ge and migrate by capillarity action
until captured by the solid phase anti-mouse rabbit polyclonal antibodies and
form a visible red test line (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-5.2.5. Antibody-Based
Test
Serology was one of the first
methods used for diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Currently,
serology is recommended for initial screening, requiring further confirmation
by histology and/or culture before treatment. Detection of antibodies is useful
for detecting past or present exposure. In fact, a limitation of serology tests
is the failure to distinguish between past and current H. pylori infection.
Blood samples are used for serology testing, detecting anti-H. pylori antibodies
(IgG) by ELISA. Several H. pylori immunogenic proteins
have been presented as candidates to detect infection, such as the FlidD
protein; multiple recombinant (CagA, VacA, GroEL, gGT, HcpC and UreA) proteins;
CagA or Omp18 (Lopes et
al., 2014).
I-5.3. Detection of H. pylori In Other Specimens
Other specimens have been evaluated
to determine their usefulness to detect H. pylori infection.
These include saliva, sub-gingival biofilm, dental plaque, gastric juice,
gastro-esophageal biopsies and adenotonsillar tissue. The ability to
detect H. pylori antibodies in saliva is lower than in
blood-based serology. However, the use of molecular techniques for the
detection of H. pylori infection in saliva or dental plaque
may make these specimens attractive because they are easier to collect. The enterotest or string test was
designed decades ago specially for children. The string test consists of a
gelatin capsule attached to a long nylon string that unwinds during ingestion.
Upon reaching the stomach, the gelatin capsule dissolves and the string absorbs
gastric secretions. The extraction of the string occurs 30-180 min later and
should avoid contact with teeth and tongue to prevent contamination. The string
may be used for culture of bacteria for H. pylori detection (Lopes et al., 2014).
I-6. Treatment from infection by H. pylori
I-6.1. Antibiotics
H.
pylori is involved in vitamin B12 and iron deficiency. The
recommended treatment for H. pylori eradication is the standard triple
therapy, using a proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine bismuth citrate, combined
with clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole. However, due to the
increase of the antibiotic resistance, some studies have started to focus on
probiotics, as a therapeutic approach (Goderska et al., 2017).
I-6.2. Probiotics
Probiotics
are defined as living microbial species that can include anti-inflammatory and
anti-oxidative mechanisms. They can improve microbial balance in the intestine
and exert positive health effects on the host, such as preventing intestinal
infections, cardiovascular diseases, cancer and anti-allergic effects. The most
used probiotic bacteria are the Lactic acid bacteria, including Gram (+) cocci
and rods Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.
A
common feature of these bacteria is the ability of anaerobic digestion of
saccharides and production of lactic acid. These microorganisms are
characterized by a resistance to los pH and tolerance to a wide range of temperatures
(Goderska et al., 2017).
I-6.2.1. Mechanisms of action
of probiotics
The mechanism of action of these probiotics include:
a- Non-immunological
mechanism: The first
line of defense against pathogenic bacteria is acidity of the stomach and the gastric
mucosa barrier. It was suggested that, by taking probiotics, this first line of
defense could be stronger due to the production of antimicrobial substances
competing with H. pylori for adhesion receptors, stimulating mucin
production and stabilizing the gut mucosal barrier (Goderska et al.,
2017).
b- Antimicrobial substances: Probiotics may inhibit H. pylori growth
by secreting short chain fatty acids and antibacterial substances. Short chain
fatty acids such as acetic, propionic, and lactic acids are produced during the
carbohydrates metabolism by probiotics and as consequence, a pH reduction are
found. Certain Lactobacillus species synthesize antimicrobial compounds
(Goderska et al., 2017).
c- Competition for adhesion: Probiotic bacteria can inhibit the
adhesion of H. pylori (Goderska et al., 2017).
d- Mucosal barrier: Probiotics increase the expression of MUC2
and MUC3 genes, and therefore extracellular secretion of mucin by colon cell
cultures can inhibit the adherence of pathogenic bacteria. This ability of
these strains restores the mucosal permeability of gastric mucosa and inhibits
the adherence of pathogenic bacteria such as H. pylori (Goderska et
al., 2017).
e- Immunologic mechanisms: The inflammatory response to gastric H.
pylori infection is characterized by the release of various inflammatory
mediators such as chemokines and cytokines. Probiotics could modify the
immunologic response by the modulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines
secretion, which would result in reduction of gastric activity and inflammation
(Goderska et al., 2017).
So, probiotics could not be recommended to be used by a single agent for
eradication therapy. However, their use is associated to standard treatment as
an adjunct will improve the eradication rates and decrease treatment-related
side effects (Goderska et al., 2017).
Conclusion and perspectives
H.
pylori is a virulent bacteria that
leads to severe pathogenic cases. To prevent infection by this bacteria,
Lactobacilli have been introduced into several fermented dairy products.
There is a large body of evidence showing the positive role of exogenous lactobacilli
in the prevention and treatment of GI disorders. Lactobacilli adhere
to cells of the GI tract by secreting a proteinaceous component, which serves
as a bridge between the bacteria and eukaryotic cell receptors, although its
precise nature still remains to be elucidated. This bacterium has been reported
to inhibit the adhesion of many kinds of pathogenic enterobacteria to
intestinal cells. Vaccination in addition to antimicrobial therapy will thus be
needed in the campaign against H. pylori. The principle of probiotics,
which involves feeding live bacteria to the host as a prophylactic or treatment
for many intestinal diseases, is a great attempt too.
1.
Johnson, KS. Ottemann, KM. (2017). Colonization, localization, and inflammation: the roles of H.
pylori chemotaxis in vivo. Curr
Opin Microbiol. 41,
51-57. 10.1016/j.mib.2017.11.019
2.
Arachchi, PS. Fernando, N. Weerasekera, MM. Senevirathna, B. Weerasekera, DD. Gunasekara, CP. (2017). Proinflammatory Cytokine IL-17 Shows a Significant Association with
Helicobacter pylori Infection and Disease Severity. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 6265150.
10.1155/2017/6265150
3.
Goderska, K. Pena, S. Alarcon, T. (2017). Helicobacter pylori treatment: antibiotics
or probiotics. Appl Microbial
Biotechnol. 102(1),
1-7. 10.1007/s00253-017-8535-7
4.
Ranjbar, R.
Khamesipour, F. Jonaidi-Jafari, N. Rahimi, E. (2016). H. pylori in bottled mineral water:
genotyping and antimicrobial resistance properties. BMC Microbial. 16, 40. 10.1186/s12866-016-0647-1
5.
Lopes, AI. Vale, F. Oleastro, M. (2014). Helicobacter pylori infection – recent
developments in diagnosis. World J Gastroenterology. 20(28).
10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9299
6.
Oleastro, M. Ménard, A.
(2013). The Role of Helicobacter
pylori Outer Membrane
Proteins in Adherence and Pathogenesis. Biology. 2(3),
1110-1134. 10.3390/biology2031110
Lucky to have the chance to read such a pure scientific post. Even though it was a little hard to understand some terms but your language was simple and clear. I liked the division of headings and the aids you used to support your ideas.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot baby ❤️
DeleteThanks for these information. and As we know this bacteria is one of the most spread bacteria between Lebanon, and as I remember in the health day at LIU-Khayra, the students make a test for this type of bacteria.
ReplyDeleteYes that is true, they did it.
ReplyDeleteBut be sure of the following information.
H. Pylori's antibodies remain in the blood of a previously exposed patient, even if he/she was cured. So, the antibody serum test is not enough, in case of a previous exposure. It may give a positive result, while the individual is not infected. Therefore, the best test for H. Pylori is either the stool test, or the urea breathe test.
In real, its the first time I read about such type of bacteria and I think its an important information to know, however, I want to shed light on the tests used for diagnosing H. pylori infection, so which test do you think is the most effective one and why?
ReplyDeletelucky to write and lucky to read. Good topic to shed light on it. This bacteria is widely spread and it can enter body easily and if people do not discover it it may lead to cancer in the stomach. so important to know and gain knowledge about it and how to diagnosis it.
ReplyDelete